|
Literatur: 1. Kelly F, et al. A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in
100 children. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2008; 18: 947-951 2. Dierdorf S.F. The LMA ProSeal™ for hip surgery in the lateral position. LMANA Case
Report. 2001 3. The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided
tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy: Abstract 4. Hohlrieder M, et al. Postoperative nausea, vomiting, airway morbidity, and analgesic
requirements are lower for ProSeal laryngeal mask airway than the tracheal tube in
females undergoing breast and gynaecological surgery. BJA. 2007; 99(4): 576-580. 5. Hohlrieder M, et al. A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA® laryngeal
mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements
following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62: 913-918. 6. Cook T.M, Gibbison B. Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask
airway™ by an anaesthetist at a district general hospital. BJA. 2007; 99(3): 436-439. 7. Brain A.I.J, Verghese C, Strube P.J, The LMA ‘ProSeal’- laryngeal mask
with oesophageal vent. BJA. 2000; 84(5): 650-654. 8. Mark D.A. Protect from aspiration with the LMA ProSeal™ after vomiting: a case report.
Can J Anesthesia. 2003; 50(1): 78-80. 9. Galante D, et al. Correspondence. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2008; 18: 81-94 |